Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Sacking was "excessive punishment" for stressed, frustrated worker

Employers' obligations to ensure psychosocial safety at work can present a "significant challenge", the Fair Work Commission has observed in finding a stressed and frustrated employee was unfairly dismissed for misconduct.

In July last year, Ventia Australia sacked the Fremantle Justice Complex custody officer for breaching its code of conduct during an incident with a person in custody (PIC) two months earlier. Specifically, it alleged he head-butted the glass section of the PIC's cell door and then later told a manager it was a shame he'd hit the door and not the PIC's head.

But the employee claimed his conduct wasn't sufficiently serious to warrant dismissal.

He told the Commission that when the PIC was dropped off at the complex, he started threatening custody officers, punching walls, kicking doors, and putting his shirt in the toilet to flood the cell...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more