Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

"Profoundly negative reaction" to referee was candidate's downfall

A candidate's job offer was never finalised because the prospective employer had a "profoundly negative reaction" to one of his referees, not because he had made an unfair dismissal claim several years earlier, a commission has ruled.

The candidate sought relief from victimisation in the NSW Industrial Relations Commission, after his application for a senior finance business partner role at Parramatta Council was unsuccessful in July last year.

He alleged the employer's CEO refused to appoint him to the role because he had claimed unfair dismissal in 2019, after his contract with another Council was terminated (that claim was settled).

The candidate claimed that last year, after he was shortlisted and interviewed for the Parramatta Council role, a third-party recruiter told him he'd been offered the position. He then provided three referees, which were forwarded to the employer...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more