Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Probation was poorly managed, but performance sacking was fair

An employer's "many failures" during a worker's probation period didn't outweigh her repeated performance errors and poor attitude, the Fair Work Commission has ruled in unfair dismissal proceedings.

The Northern Territory Department of Health registered nurse was dismissed in January this year, just short of her one-year work anniversary, for failing to improve her workplace performance and behaviour.

In claiming unfair dismissal, she argued: her performance issues were only "minor"; the employer's dismissal reasons were "vague" and "unfairly critical"; and she had been subjected to more scrutiny than her colleagues.

Further, the employer failed to follow its own probation-period processes; it didn't undertake any probation reviews nor adequately supervise her, she said. Had it done so, she would have had a "successful start" to her career, given her "significant redeeming qualities"...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more