Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

"Pernickety" employee's grievances weren't discrimination: court

In a decision that "highlights the perils of litigating hurt feelings", a court has found an employee wrongly interpreted "petty workplace disagreements" as race-based insults.

Federal Circuit Court Judge Sophie Given found the employee's allegations did have "some factually accurate genesis (even if only a scintilla)", but that she built upon mostly "unremarkable" workplace events, "to cast them in a more nefarious light".

Having "become a disciple" to her version of events over time, Judge Given said, the employee viewed incidents with colleagues "through a prism which, at a minimum, construes interactions as always involving an insult of some kind, and in some instances could only be the result of fabrication by her".

During her employment as a Bing Lee Electronics sales consultant, the employee "came to understand that she was not especially popular or well-liked" among colleagues at the Old Guildford store where she worked, the Judge noted...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more