Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

High-paid exec's "offensive" comments didn't warrant summary dismissal

A senior executive who muttered "offensive" words during an out-of-hours incident has won claims for adverse action and breach of contract, with the Federal Circuit Court chastising his employer for its incorrect allegations and "misleading" investigation.

In his 324-page decision, Judge Nicholas Manousaridis also found the employer's dismissal letter wasn't composed in "good faith"; it contained conclusions that were "untethered from the evidence" and were "manifestly destitute of particulars".

In July 2020, Laing O'Rourke emailed the letter to the commercial leader, informing him he was being summarily dismissed for serious misconduct.

The letter said the executive had breached the employer's code of conduct during an incident earlier that month, creating an "imminent and serious risk" to the employer's reputation, and had lied to the human capital and industrial relations lead during a subsequent workplace investigation...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more