Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Ending casual worker's assignment was a dismissal

It was "disingenuous" of an employer to claim it didn't dismiss a casual worker, after it removed her from an assignment due to misconduct allegations, then made no attempt to give her further shifts, the Fair Work Commission has ruled.

There was no reasonable basis upon which Adecco could argue the worker remained employed and had not been dismissed, Deputy President Judith Wright said in dismissing its objection to facing her general protections claim.

Adecco employed the casual and on-hired her to work at Amazon's Kemps Creek site, for about nine months until August 2023.

In June 2023, Amazon's HR team contacted Adecco's on-site HR representative to inform her of misconduct allegations made against the worker by Amazon employees. The allegations included that the worker stared at another employee in an intimidating manner and laughed in her face, and made inappropriate comments...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more