Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Employer didn't "obtain" jobs on same site for retrenched workers

An employer has failed to prove it shouldn't have to pay redundancy entitlements to workers who moved to a new labour supplier at the same site after a contract changed hands.

Ready Workforce (a division of Chandler Macleod) had sought an exemption from paying 12 workers' redundancy entitlements (of up to seven weeks each), on the basis it had obtained other acceptable employment for them under section 120 of the Fair Work Act.

The Fair Work Commission heard that after Ready Workforce unsuccessfully re-tendered for a Mount Arthur coal mine contract in September last year, it took steps that "created" employment offers from Programmed, which was taking over the contract.

But Commissioner Ian Cambridge rejected its application in June this year, finding that while Ready Workforce had provided "facilitation and assistance" for potential employment with Programmed, it hadn't obtained alternative employment for the workers...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more