Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Employee sacked over refusing directions, not workplace complaints

An employer's responses to an employee's workplace complaints were "prompt" and "thorough", the Federal Circuit Court has ruled, finding it dismissed him because he couldn't perform the inherent requirements of his role.

The StarTrack Express freight handler claimed the employer took adverse action against him on 12 occasions, culminating in his dismissal in September 2021, because he'd exercised his workplace rights. He also claimed it discriminated against him on the basis of his Asian race.

But the employer denied any unlawful conduct, specifically arguing its dismissal decision – which was the only "adverse action" it took – was due to the employee's inability to safely perform the inherent requirements of his role, and his failure to provide medical certificates at certain times during his nine-month absence from work.

The Court heard the employee complained on numerous occasions about colleagues smoking in the bathrooms and he believed the employer's response, in reminding staff of their health and safety obligations, was "inadequate"...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more