Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Dismissal scope broadened, as case raises new issues for employers

The Fair Work Commission has 'hinted' at a new approach to determining employment contract disputes, in an important ruling analysing whether a demotion was a dismissal, a lawyer says.

Last year, NSW Trains lost its jurisdictional objection to a demoted employee's unfair dismissal claim, after Deputy President Tony Saunders found the reduction in his classification level and remuneration was "significant", for the purposes of ss386(1)(a) and 386(2)(c) of the Fair Work Act.

This month, however, a five-member full bench majority upheld the employer's appeal, finding the Deputy President misconstrued the expression "employment... has been terminated".

It also found the employee's enterprise agreement authorised demotion as a disciplinary measure separate to dismissal, which meant he wasn't dismissed...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more