Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

"Confusing" adverse action claim against HR managers dismissed

It would be unfair to require an employer and two HR professionals to defend an employee's "incomprehensible" adverse action claim, the Federal Circuit Court has ruled.

In his general protections claim, the clinical practice supervisor sought pecuniary penalties and damages against his employer, Yourtown Pty Ltd, its head of people and culture, a former employment relations manager, and a contracted solicitor.

His original statement of claim ran for 211 pages, and two subsequent affidavits totalled 191 pages, with 260 pages of annexures.

The employer and HR managers first sought to have his statement of claim struck out on the basis it was "incomprehensible", but they later applied for his case to be dismissed entirely...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more