Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Casual ruling signals a shift in FWC's reasoning

A new ruling on whether a casual was entitled to claim unfair dismissal indicates a significant "shift" in the Fair Work Commission's approach, an employment lawyer says.

As reported in this article, the FWC found a casual who worked every week for 14 months did not have "regular and systematic" employment, nor should she have had an expectation of ongoing employment based on the wording of her contract.

Kingston Reid partner Christa Lenard says this decision is "interesting", and – together with an extension-of-time ruling from April – "signal a shift in reasoning", influenced by recent High Court decisions...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more