Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires a basic HR Daily subscription. Log in below or sign up for free.

Verbal agreement "vague", but arrangements pointed to contracting

A worker has failed to prove he was entitled to employee benefits for the seven years he performed duties for an organisation, after the Federal Circuit Court found the parties' arrangements indicated he was a contractor.

In 2012, Caelli Constructions offered the worker a full-time role as a formwork supervisor. He accepted and remained in the position until Caelli terminated the arrangement in mid-2020.

Before Judge Alister McNab, the worker claimed he was entitled to employee benefits including redundancy pay, superannuation, and annual and long-service leave on the termination of his employment.

But the employer said the worker was at all times a "permanent contractor" supplying services to it on behalf of a company called Pruessner Holdings...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Haven't seen HR Daily before?

Sign up now for your free HR Daily newsletter subscription.

Join here to stay informed

Written specifically for human resources practitioners, our articles will keep you informed about all the important HR news, thought leadership and trends. You'll receive:

Access to all our free editorial Four-plus new articles each week Excerpts from our compliance and best-practice webcasts Event invitations And much more