This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
Employees resist using EAPs because they fear being perceived as weak, or they see them as a performance management tool rather than aiding wellbeing, research shows.
Early employee assistance programs took the form of "coercive substance abuse interventions" used as a surrogate for disciplinary action, and although they have evolved into voluntary wellbeing programs, EAPs continue to carry stigma, says University of WA business school HR management lecturer Tianyi Long, in a new research article.
Employees don't trust EAPs, because they see them as managerial tools used to improve performance issues, and believe they serve management's interests more than their own, Long contends...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more