Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Female manager claims she suffered "pushy penalty" for seeking pay rise

A tribunal will now reconsider whether an employer discriminated against a female manager who earned less than her male colleagues, after an appeal court accepted it applied outdated concepts to her original claim.

The Austin Health orthotic and prosthetic department manager claimed the employer discriminated against her on the basis of her sex and age, when it denied her the opportunity to negotiate and be paid remuneration that was above the relevant enterprise agreement rates.

The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal heard that after becoming manager, she discovered several male subordinates were being paid above-agreement rates, with one in particular receiving well in excess of her remuneration (at one point, $41k more).

Between 2011 and 2015, the manager approached her superiors on five occasions to negotiate an over-agreement salary for herself, without success...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more